December 8, 2008

Whopper Virgins

Burger King exploits indigenous people for taste test experiment and calls it a “film”.

I hate that I’m contributing to the viral nature of something Burger King is praying will go viral, but I wanted others to see this and maybe have a conversation about it.

I wish I could repost the thoughts of the person who brought it to my attention, and I’d link you, but it was a friends only post on Live Journal. Essentially his point was that Burger King was exploiting these people and that they were douche-nozzles for introducing fast food into their otherwise natural diets which, for the most part, have remained unchanged for a long effing time. Basically, Burger King was a bunch of assholes for giving these people the inevitable shits that even we, who are used to this kind of food, are prone to get after ingesting it.

Imagine the consequence of a Whopper AND a Big Mac on the delicate digestive systems of these people? That’s just evil!

And let’s be clear here. What I linked above is NOT a film, it’s an advertisement. Burger King is counting on people to talk about this, good or bad, in the hopes it going viral and ultimately selling more product. Burger King looooves viral internet advertising. Maybe you’ll recall their Subservient Chicken of 2004. This is just another attempt and it’s probably going to work.

On one hand, the concept IS pretty interesting, but at the same time, I can’t help but feel that these people were being totally exploited, both by introducing fast food crap that we all know is bad for us into their culture and for using them in a sneaky form of advertising that they’d never see, probably wouldn’t understand if it was explained to them and was likely misleading in nature.

This wasn’t an exploration in anything, this was a stunt. If it were a true exploration in the form of documentary, as I’m pretty sure they want everyone to believe, we would have heard more from those “no preference” people, who I’m thinking probably thought both burgers were equally repulsive.

Also, you and I as North American consumers of fast food (well, most of you) know the gastro-intestinal repercussions of eating such foods and our systems are USED TO IT. Did Burger King explain to these people that within 24 hours of eating both the Big Mac and the Whopper they were almost guaranteed to have explosive shits the likes of which they’d probably never experienced before? Don’t you think it would be cruel to not forewarn them? I’m very curious to see if this taste testing came with a disclaimer.

I would love to see someone do a REAL documentary debunking this “Whopper Virgins” bullshit. I’d like to hear what those people really had to say, not just the ones that were selected for the ad (I refuse to call it a “film” anymore) and not just the clips we heard. I’d love for a documentary crew to interview them the next day or the day after and ask how they FELT after digestion and if the people thought it was good food or bad food to add to their diet and what they thought of the unfortunate fact that fast food makes up a significant portion of the North American diet. I bet a real investigation would be very different than what Burger King has presented in their ad.

Anyway, the whole thing just left a bad taste in my mouth. I don’t like it. I think it’s bullshit.  What say you?

Posted at 1:23 am in: Advertising , Food , Internet , videos

8 Comments

The comments for this entry can be syndicated via RSS.

  1. Rhubarbedwire says:

    Next video from Burger King: The truth about 9/11 vs the truth about tasty whoppers.

  2. I’m thinking the subjects/victims were made to sign waivers and are undoubtedly legally bound to say nothing to anyone except Burger King officials, regarding all aspects of their involvement in the advertisement. I, too, think such exploitation (what capitalists call “progress”) is unethical — not to mention immoral. But money talks. =^..^=

  3. William says:

    Ha!
    I think this is a terrible idea for a commercial, but I don’t know about hurting their digestive systems.
    Remember, a “natural” diet in this case does not mean veggies and cruelty free soy milk. It means eating whatever you can catch, run down, or dig up. At least the shitty hamburgers don’t usually come with intestinal parasites.

  4. Ashley says:

    Marion Nestle (one of America’s bigger nutrition people—she had a cameo in Super Size Me) had an interesting post about it in her blog. It makes most of the same comments though.

  5. Sunny says:

    William, these people all came from cultures that farm. They likely live on mostly veggies, goat’s milk and goats. The only hunting I could see was that of seals.

    Ashley, thanks for the link, she said exactly what I was trying to say!

  6. Lexi says:

    Yeah, that is pretty upsetting. :o(

    Part of me wonders how many of those people only said it tasted good to be polite and because everyone was watching. I like that the Inuit guy at the end said that he still likes seal better. TAKE THAT BURGER KING! I like seal better too, SO THERE! :oP (Mind, I’ve also never had a whopper but I’m not a fan of fast food burgers unless it’s the chicken ones. But still.)

    Oh, also RE the “natural” diet. Hunting doesn’t equal scavenging. Cultures who have to hunt for their food know how to find food that is good for them. It’s not like they’re rooting through garbage, y’know?

  7. Lexi says:

    Oh! And I remember Subservient Chicken. That shit creeped me the hell out.

  8. alhooter says:

    Oops I didn’t realize I had made that friends only, force of habit I guess. I like the other points you made about the viral nature of this campaign. I had considered that, but I hope that enough people speak up versus the amount that go and buy the burger.